Web survey bibliography (4086)

Page:

• 1
...
• 29
• 30
• 31
...
• 82

• Media tracker; 2012
• Measuring the quality of governmental websites in a controlled versus an online setting with the ‘...; 2012; Elling, S., Lentz, L., de Jong , M., van den Bergh, H.
• Measuring modern media consumption; 2012; Arini, N.
• ISO 20252. Market, opinion and social research-Vocabulary and service requirements, 2nd Edition; 2012
• Is „chapterisation“ a viable alternative to traditional progress indicators ?; 2012; Spicer, R., Dowling, Z.
• Internet use in households and by individual in 2012. Eurostat Statistics in Focus 50/2012; 2012; Seybert, H.
• Internet access - Households and individuals, 2012 part 2; 2012
• Internet access - Households and individuals, 2012; 2012
• Google et Médiamétrie créent une audience bimédia; 2012; Gonzales, P.
• GMI Pinnacle; 2012
• Global market research 2012; 2012
• Explaining rising nonresponse rates in cross-sectional surveys; 2012; Brick, J. M., Williams, Do.
• Eurobarometer Special surveys: Special Eurobarometer 381; 2012
• Online Surveys 2.0; 2012; Elferink, R.
• The Impact of Academic Sponsorship on Online Survey Dropout Rates; 2012; Allen, P. J., Roberts, L. D.
• Especially for You: Motivating Respondents in an Internet Panel by Offering Tailored Questions; 2012; Oudejans, M.
• Social media as a data collection tool: the impact of Facebook in behavioural research; 2012; Zoppos, E.
• Smartphone Apps and User Engagement: Collecting Data in the Digital Era; 2012; Link, M. W.
• Snowball Sampling in Online Social Networks; 2012; Raissi, M., Ackland, R.
• The Use of Facebook as a Locating and Contacting Tool; 2012; McCarthy, T.
• How Often Do You Use the App with a Bird on It? Exploring Differences in Survey Completion Times, Primacy...; 2012; Buskirk, T. D.
• Data quality of questions sensitive to social-desirability bias in web surveys; 2012; Lozar Manfreda, K., Zajc, N., Berzelak, N., Vehovar, V.
• Online Questionnaires: Development of ‘basic requirements’; 2012; Tries, S., Blanke, K.
• Social research in online context: methodological reflections on web surveys from a case study; 2012; Pandolfini, V.
• Efficacy of a health-related Facebook social network site on health-seeking behaviors; 2012; Woolley, P., Peterson, M.
• The war against unengaged online respondents; 2012; Gittelman, S. H., Trimarchi, E.
• Qualitatively Speaking: The five absolute, no-excuse must-dos for online qualitative researchers; 2012; Rossow, A.
• By the Numbers: Lessons for using online panels in B2B research; 2012; Elsner, N.
• Specialized Tools for Measuring Past Events ; 2012; Belli, R. F.
• Transparency, Access and the Credibility of Survey Research; 2012; Lupia, A.
• Can Microtargeting Improve Survey Sampling? An Assessment of Accuracy and Bias in Consumer File Marketing...; 2012; Pasek, J.
• Anonymity and Confidentiality; 2012; Tourangeau, R.
• Cognitive Evaluation of Survey Instruments: State of the Science (Art?) and Future Directions; 2012; Willis, G. B.
• Oh, Just One More Thing … Leveraging “Leave-Behinds” in Data Collection; 2012; Link, M. W.
• Paradata; 2012; Kreuter, F.
• Computation of Survey Weights: Bridging Theory and Practice; 2012; DeBell, M.
• Optimizing Response Rates; 2012; Brick, J. M.
• Modes of Data Collection; 2012; Tourangeau, R.
• The Use and Effects of Incentives in Surveys; 2012; Singer, E.
• Improving Question Design to Maximize Reliability and Validity; 2012; Krosnick, J. A.
• Respondent Attrition vs Data Attrition and Their Reduction; 2012; Olsen, R. J.
• Survey Interviewing: Deviations from the Script; 2012; Schaeffer, N. C.
• How accurate are surveys of objective phenomena?; 2012; Chang, L. C., Krosnick, J. A.
• Measure the response burden in the Swedish Intrastat system; 2012; Weideskog, F.
• Mode and non-response effects and their treatment; 2012; Chrysanthopoulos, S., Georgostathi, A.
• What can be said about quality in the Central Population Register based on a self-completion survey...; 2012; Falnes-Dalheim, E., Pedersen, H. E.
• Improving the quality of complex surveys: The case of the EU Labour Force Survey ; 2012; van der Valk, J.
• Pros and cons of Internet based User Satisfaction Surveys; 2012; Consoli, A., Matsulevits, L.
• Between demand and reality: Ensuring efficiency and quality in pretesting questionnaires; 2012; Sattelberger, S., Blanke, K.
• How to provide high data quality in online-questionnaires: Setting guidelines in design; 2012; Tries, S., Nebel, S., Blanke, K.

Page:

• 1
...
• 29
• 30
• 31
...
• 82